OnScript reads what members of Congress publish and counts the phrases they say together. Every claim below links to the press releases it came from.
Today on OnScript
Observed congressional language on 2026-10-21, rendered as two cited automated composites.
Measurement: 62 publications were observed for the Democratic party on 2026-10-21.
generated_verifiedAcross 62 statements, no phrase was shared by more than a few of us today. The closest alignment is the phrase hundreds of thousands, recorded 4 times, first recorded in our corpus from Jeff Crank (R-CO). Beyond that measurement, we have no shared messages to report for today.
A composite voice, machine-composed from the day’s measured phrases. No member spoke these exact sentences; the quoted spans are verbatim (see receipts).
No talking point cleared the 3-member threshold today — nothing to cite.
Measurement: 42 publications were observed for the Republican party on 2026-10-21.
deterministic_fallbackToday 42 of us released statements. 3 of us carried "million in federal funding". Our most synchronized phrase, used by 4 of us: will continue working.
A composite voice, machine-composed from the day’s measured phrases. No member spoke these exact sentences; the quoted spans are verbatim (see receipts).
- 9 million in federal funding through the department
- 75 million in federal funding through the u
- 7 million in federal funding for key infrastructure
Where language spread this window
D Democrats
Peak 28 offices on 2026-09-11.
Democrats (solid line) Republicans (dashed line)
R Republicans
Peak 19 offices on 2026-09-11.
Democrats (solid line) Republicans (dashed line)
How these two were chosen: for each party independently, code takes that party's phrase with the highest single-day office count in the trailing 90 days, counting only phrases that reached at least 15 offices on some day in that window. Ties go to the earlier first appearance, then to the alphabetically first identifier. No model chooses, and neither party's pick constrains the other's.
How this is counted
Participation in eligible message claims
Each measure keeps one count unit from numerator through denominator.
D
- Office participation: 0 offices of 46 offices. Window: party-day 2026-10-21. Method: participation-measures-v1.
- Publication participation: 0 publications of 62 publications. Window: party-day 2026-10-21. Method: participation-measures-v1.
- Document-family participation: 0 document families of 60 document families. Window: party-day 2026-10-21. Method: participation-measures-v1.
R
- Office participation: 3 offices of 38 offices. Window: party-day 2026-10-21. Method: participation-measures-v1.
- Publication participation: 3 publications of 42 publications. Window: party-day 2026-10-21. Method: participation-measures-v1.
- Document-family participation: 3 document families of 40 document families. Window: party-day 2026-10-21. Method: participation-measures-v1.
These two bases differ. Office counts come from the day's eligible caucus offices in the nightly symmetry audit; publication counts come from the day's source publications. A joint release is one publication and can carry several offices, so the two never have to agree.
How phrases are sorted
Classification lanes
The deterministic classifier separates messages, shared names, procedure, and retained raw observations.
Messages
- will continue working
- hundreds of thousands
- transparency and accountability
- attention to this matter
- thank you for your attention
Shared names
- No observations in this lane.
Procedure
- raised concerns that
- federal funding for
- federal state and
- office received a
Raw observations
- letter is available
- text of the letter is available
Raw observations remain available in the experimental exports.
Nightly symmetry audit: nightly symmetry audit. Every distilled claim above is citation-backed.
Repeated phrase observations
This table lists repeated phrase observations, ranked by how many members used the same exact phrase. It is not filtered to coordinated messages, so it can include official names, procedural formulas, and biographical phrasing, not only messages. The sparkline is the phrase's 14-day trajectory.
Each party’s own most-synchronized phrases, ranked within the party so the larger caucus can’t fill the table — every count travels with its caucus denominator.
D repeated phrases
- 5 of 257 (1.9%) raised concerns that
- 5 of 257 (1.9%) federal funding for
- 4 of 257 (1.6%) hundreds of thousands
- 4 of 257 (1.6%) transparency and accountability
- 4 of 257 (1.6%) attention to this matter
- 4 of 257 (1.6%) thank you for your attention
- 3 of 257 (1.2%) social media platforms
- 3 of 257 (1.2%) office received a
- 3 of 257 (1.2%) according to recent
- 3 of 257 (1.2%) intended to help
R repeated phrases
- 4 of 271 (1.5%) federal state and
- 4 of 271 (1.5%) will continue working
- 4 of 271 (1.5%) to help bring
- 4 of 271 (1.5%) million in federal
- 3 of 271 (1.1%) waste fraud and abuse
- 3 of 271 (1.1%) million in federal funding
- 3 of 271 (1.1%) need to protect
- 3 of 271 (1.1%) across this country
- 3 of 271 (1.1%) i’m proud to have
- 3 of 271 (1.1%) proud to help
Each table is one party measured against that party's own caucus, so row counts are not comparable across the two. Differences in how much each party publishes are measured in the nightly symmetry audit, not here. See the nightly symmetry audit.