OnScript · 2026-08-07
Observed congressional language on 2026-08-07, rendered as two cited automated composites.
Measurement: 99 publications were observed for the Democratic party on 2026-08-07.
deterministic_fallbackToday 99 of us released statements. Our most synchronized phrase, used by 7 of us: sanctions on russia.
A composite voice, machine-composed from the day’s measured phrases. No member spoke these exact sentences; the quoted spans are verbatim (see receipts).
No talking point cleared the 3-member threshold today — nothing to cite.
Measurement: 66 publications were observed for the Republican party on 2026-08-07.
deterministic_fallbackToday 66 of us released statements. 3 offices across 3 publications and 3 families carried "of the Lindsey O". 3 offices across 3 publications and 3 families carried "Senate passed the Lindsey O". Our most synchronized phrase, used by 6 of us: purchasers of russian.
A composite voice, machine-composed from the day’s measured phrases. No member spoke these exact sentences; the quoted spans are verbatim (see receipts).
- as an original cosponsor of the lindsey o
- statement after senate passage of the lindsey o
- senate’s passage of the lindsey o
- after the senate passed the lindsey o
- the senate passed the lindsey o
- after the senate passed the lindsey o
How this is counted
Participation in eligible message claims
Each measure keeps one count unit from numerator through denominator.
D
- Office participation: 0 offices of 58 offices. Window: party-day 2026-08-07. Method: participation-measures-v1.
- Publication participation: 0 publications of 99 publications. Window: party-day 2026-08-07. Method: participation-measures-v1.
- Document-family participation: 0 document families of 94 document families. Window: party-day 2026-08-07. Method: participation-measures-v1.
R
- Office participation: 5 offices of 40 offices. Window: party-day 2026-08-07. Method: participation-measures-v1.
- Publication participation: 5 publications of 66 publications. Window: party-day 2026-08-07. Method: participation-measures-v1.
- Document-family participation: 5 document families of 66 document families. Window: party-day 2026-08-07. Method: participation-measures-v1.
These two bases differ. Office counts come from the day's eligible caucus offices in the nightly symmetry audit; publication counts come from the day's source publications. A joint release is one publication and can carry several offices, so the two never have to agree.
Nightly symmetry audit: nightly symmetry audit. Every distilled claim above is citation-backed.
Repeated phrase observations
This table lists repeated phrase observations, ranked by how many members used the same exact phrase. It is not filtered to coordinated messages, so it can include official names, procedural formulas, and biographical phrasing, not only messages. The sparkline is the phrase's 14-day trajectory.
Each party’s own most-synchronized phrases, ranked within the party so the larger caucus can’t fill the table — every count travels with its caucus denominator.
D repeated phrases
- 7 of 257 (2.7%) sanctions on russia
- 6 of 257 (2.3%) oil and gas
- 6 of 257 (2.3%) war in iran
- 6 of 257 (2.3%) for the american people
- 5 of 257 (1.9%) bill is available
- 5 of 257 (1.9%) access to care
- 5 of 257 (1.9%) the president’s desk
- 5 of 257 (1.9%) federal funding to
- 4 of 257 (1.6%) russian oil and gas
- 4 of 257 (1.6%) companion legislation in the house
R repeated phrases
- 6 of 271 (2.2%) russia’s war in
- 6 of 271 (2.2%) purchasers of russian
- 5 of 271 (1.8%) russian officials oligarchs their family members
- 4 of 271 (1.5%) sanctions target russian officials oligarchs
- 4 of 271 (1.5%) oligarchs their family members foreign persons
- 4 of 271 (1.5%) target russian officials oligarchs their family
- 4 of 271 (1.5%) officials oligarchs their family members foreign
- 4 of 271 (1.5%) gas accountable for supporting russia’s war
- 4 of 271 (1.5%) russian banks and financial institutions
- 4 of 271 (1.5%) actors supporting russia’s war
Each table is one party measured against that party's own caucus, so row counts are not comparable across the two. Differences in how much each party publishes are measured in the nightly symmetry audit, not here. See the nightly symmetry audit.