Observed congressional language, rendered as two cited automated composites.

Automated measurement. Composite prose is generated from claims selected and counted by code.

“to fight for”

Adoption curve: how many independent members of each party used this exact phrase, by day. Where at least three distinct offices can be grounded, peak-day source receipts appear below.

Phrase adoption curveDemocrats peak at 7 members; Republicans peak at 4 members, from 2026-06-01 through 2026-07-09.047peak 7 · 2026-06-122026-06-012026-06-102026-06-222026-06-302026-07-09

Democrats  Republicans

First recorded in our corpus
2026-06-01 by member name unavailable (tied with member name unavailable, member name unavailable, member name unavailable)
Peak
7 members in one day · 2026-06-12
Distinctiveness
The full-history weight is withheld until the Archive release; it is not part of these public-window statistics.
Data points
25 active days

Peak-day evidence

On 2026-06-12, this exact phrase is grounded in 9 distinct source units (an office or joint-release family). The Peak figure above is the largest count for either party; this evidence total counts grounded units across both parties on that same day. Showing 5 of 9 source receipts. (D: 7; R: 2)

Gabe Amo (D-RI) · 2026-06-12 · source · archived
Haley M. Stevens (D-MI) · 2026-06-12 · source · archived
Jared Huffman (D-CA) · 2026-06-12 · source · archived
Juan Ciscomani (R-AZ) · 2026-06-12 · source · archived
Michael K. Simpson (R-ID) · 2026-06-12 · source · archived

Public Stage-1 phrase statistics begin 2025-01-03. Coverage for the same window is shown on the Methodology page. (The full-history “Alexandria” backfill to 2001 is staged for a later phase.)

← All phrases